SIPyield
White Mode

Financial Comparison Suite

Pit two investment plans against each other and watch the wealth gap compound.

Back to Home Dashboard
AdSense Node — Top Canvas (728×90)
Verdict

Plan A wins by ₹1.53 Cr

₹1.53 Cr

After 20 years • SIP (Monthly) vs Lumpsum

Plan A Corpus

₹2.5 Cr

SIP (Monthly)

Plan B Corpus

₹96.46 L

Lumpsum

Plan A Invested

₹60 L

Plan B Invested

₹10 L

Wealth Gap

₹1.53 Cr

Plan A leads

Gap Ratio

2.59×

A ÷ B

AdSense Node — In-Result Native (300×100)
Back to Home Dashboard

Why Side-by-Side Comparison Matters

Every investment decision is implicitly a comparison — choosing one plan means foregoing another. The Financial Comparison Suite makes that opportunity cost explicit by projecting two plans on a shared horizon and visualising the wealth gap as it compounds year over year.

How To Read the Chart

  • Plan A and Plan B trajectories show projected corpus by year.
  • The Wealth Gap series highlights the absolute difference — the divergence widens when one plan's compounding rate or contribution profile dominates the other.
  • Switch plan types or tweak rates to instantly see how a 1% rate edge translates to a 7-figure gap over a 20-year horizon — the core insight behind disciplined long-term investing.

Recommended Comparisons

  • SIP vs Lumpsum — does deploying today's bonus beat drip-feeding?
  • SIP vs Step-Up SIP — quantify the dividend of escalating contributions with income.
  • FD vs PPF — debt-instrument shoot-out for capital-preservation goals.
  • RD vs SIP — the classic debt-vs-equity recurring-contribution dilemma.